Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Slovenia
Slovenia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 90 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Slovenia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Slovenia is 90, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Slovenia peaked at 90 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 80, in 2005.
That places Slovenia 4th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Slovenia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 80 | — |
| 2006 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 90 | +12.5% |
| 2009 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84 | 80 | 90 | 5 |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Slovenia
- 1 Cambodia 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 4 Canada 90 compare
- 4 Israel 90 compare
- 4 Kuwait 90 compare
- 4 Malaysia 90 compare
- 4 New Zealand 90 compare
- 4 North Macedonia 90 compare
- 4 Rwanda 90 compare
- 4 Saudi Arabia 90 compare
- 4 Singapore 90 compare
- 4 Trinidad and Tobago 90 compare
More reference data data for Slovenia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.064 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0228 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2921 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3244 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.124 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Slovenia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Slovenia was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Slovenia?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2008.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Slovenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2005.
- How does Slovenia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Slovenia ranks 4th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Slovenia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Slovenia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.