Slovenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
Slovenia
90
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
90
in 2019
Slovenia rank
4th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
4th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- Slovenia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 90 against 90 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Slovenia ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84 | 90 | 6 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, Slovenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Slovenia, at 90 against 90 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Slovenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Slovenia ranks 4th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.