North Macedonia vs Saudi Arabia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index
North Macedonia
90
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
90
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
4th
Saudi Arabia rank
4th
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index over time
- North Macedonia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 90 against 90 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 4th and Saudi Arabia ranks 4th of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62 | 74 | 12 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 82 | 82 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index, North Macedonia or Saudi Arabia?
- North Macedonia, at 90 against 90 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index between North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- North Macedonia ranks 4th and Saudi Arabia ranks 4th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.