Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Moldova
Moldova: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score was 60 in 2013. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Moldova, 2005–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Moldova is 60, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Moldova peaked at 60 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 53.33, in 2005.
Moldova ranks 53rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score in Moldova, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 53.33 | — |
| 2006 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 53.33 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 60 | +12.5% |
| 2013 | 60 | +0.0% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 60 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 53.33, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 60 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 60, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 53.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 53.33 | 60 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
- 53 India 60 compare
- 53 Indonesia 60 compare
- 53 Botswana 60 compare
- 53 Cyprus 60 compare
- 53 Guyana 60 compare
- 53 Kiribati 60 compare
- 53 Latvia 60 compare
- 53 Papua New Guinea 60 compare
- 53 Poland 60 compare
- 53 Portugal 60 compare
- 53 Solomon Islands 60 compare
- 53 Spain 60 compare
- 53 Sri Lanka 60 compare
More reference data data for Moldova
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2466 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1366 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6426 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Moldova?
- Protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score in Moldova was 60 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 60 in 2012.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 53.33 in 2005.
- How does Moldova rank for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Moldova ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2013.
- Is protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.