Latvia, Republic of vs Moldova, Republic of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- Moldova, Republic of
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 60 against 60 in Moldova, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 53rd and Moldova, Republic of ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Latvia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia, Republic of | Moldova, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 53.33 | 6.67 | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 60 | 56.67 | 3.33 | Latvia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Latvia, Republic of or Moldova, Republic of?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 60 against 60 in Moldova, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Latvia, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of?
- 0, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and Moldova, Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 53rd and Moldova, Republic of ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.