Botswana vs Moldova: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Botswana
60
in 2013
Moldova
60
in 2013
Botswana rank
53rd
Moldova rank
53rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Moldova
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 60 against 60 in Moldova, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Moldova ahead.

Botswana ranks 53rd and Moldova ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 50 53.33 3.33 Moldova
2010s 60 56.67 3.33 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Botswana or Moldova?
Botswana, at 60 against 60 in Moldova as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Botswana and Moldova?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Moldova?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Botswana and Moldova rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Botswana ranks 53rd and Moldova ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.