Kiribati vs Moldova: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
60
in 2013
Moldova
60
in 2013
Kiribati rank
53rd
Moldova rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Moldova
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 60 against 60 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 53rd and Moldova ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 53.33 | 6.67 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 60 | 56.67 | 3.33 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Moldova?
- Kiribati, at 60 against 60 in Moldova as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Moldova?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Moldova?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kiribati and Moldova rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 53rd and Moldova ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.