Political Stability/No Violence in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Political Stability/No Violence was 0.2429 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling

Latest (2011)
0.2429 standard error
Change on year
up 2.9%
World rank
32nd
of 53 countries
All-time high
0.364 standard error
in 1996
All-time low
0.236 standard error
in 2010
Years of data
13
1996–2011

Political Stability/No Violence in Zimbabwe, 1996–2011

00.10.20.30.41996200320111996: 0.364 standard error1998: 0.335 standard error2000: 0.333 standard error2002: 0.296 standard error2003: 0.293 standard error2004: 0.285 standard error2005: 0.278 standard error2006: 0.244 standard error2007: 0.24 standard error2008: 0.244 standard error2009: 0.236 standard error2010: 0.236 standard error2011: 0.243 standard error

Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.

Analysis

The most recent figure for political stability/no violence in Zimbabwe is 0.2429 standard error, measured in 2011.

That represents a change of up 2.9% on the previous year and down 27.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, political stability/no violence in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.364 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.236 standard error, in 2010.

Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 53 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.3496 standard error 0.3352 standard error 0.364 standard error 2
2000s 0.2722 standard error 0.2364 standard error 0.3333 standard error 9
2010s 0.2395 standard error 0.236 standard error 0.2429 standard error 2

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 32 Algeria 0.2429 standard error compare
  2. 32 Angola 0.2429 standard error compare
  3. 32 Botswana 0.2429 standard error compare
  4. 32 Burkina Faso 0.2429 standard error compare
  5. 32 Cameroon 0.2429 standard error compare
  6. 32 Cote d'Ivoire 0.2429 standard error compare
  7. 32 Egypt 0.2429 standard error compare
  8. 32 Ethiopia 0.2429 standard error compare
  9. 32 Ghana 0.2429 standard error compare
  10. 32 Kenya 0.2429 standard error compare
  11. 32 Madagascar 0.2429 standard error compare
  12. 32 Mali 0.2429 standard error compare
  13. 32 Mozambique 0.2429 standard error compare
  14. 32 Namibia 0.2429 standard error compare
  15. 32 Nigeria 0.2429 standard error compare
  16. 32 Senegal 0.2429 standard error compare
  17. 32 Tanzania 0.2429 standard error compare
  18. 32 Tunisia 0.2429 standard error compare
  19. 32 Uganda 0.2429 standard error compare
  20. 32 Zambia 0.2429 standard error compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is political stability/no violence in Zimbabwe?
Political stability/no violence in Zimbabwe was 0.2429 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
What is the highest political stability/no violence recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 0.364 standard error in 1996.
What is the lowest political stability/no violence recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 0.236 standard error in 2010.
How does Zimbabwe rank for political stability/no violence?
Zimbabwe ranks 32nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
Is political stability/no violence rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.