Political Stability/No Violence in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Political Stability/No Violence was 0.2429 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Political Stability/No Violence in Burkina Faso, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, political stability/no violence in Burkina Faso stood at 0.2429 standard error.
The figure is up 2.9% on the previous year and down 39.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political stability/no violence in Burkina Faso peaked at 0.4267 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.236 standard error, in 2010.
That places Burkina Faso 32nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4067 standard error | 0.3867 standard error | 0.4267 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.3046 standard error | 0.2364 standard error | 0.4023 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.2395 standard error | 0.236 standard error | 0.2429 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Burkina Faso
- 32 Algeria 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Angola 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Botswana 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Cameroon 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Cote d'Ivoire 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Egypt 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Ethiopia 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Ghana 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Kenya 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Madagascar 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Mali 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Mozambique 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Namibia 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Nigeria 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Senegal 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Tanzania 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Tunisia 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Uganda 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Zambia 0.2429 standard error compare
- 32 Zimbabwe 0.2429 standard error compare
More reference data data for Burkina Faso
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 8,953 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 772.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 39.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 18,150 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 65.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 820.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0609 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 33.78 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political stability/no violence in Burkina Faso?
- Political stability/no violence in Burkina Faso was 0.2429 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest political stability/no violence recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4267 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest political stability/no violence recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.236 standard error in 2010.
- How does Burkina Faso rank for political stability/no violence?
- Burkina Faso ranks 32nd out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is political stability/no violence rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.