Nigeria vs Zimbabwe: Political Stability/No Violence

Nigeria
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Zimbabwe
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Nigeria rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Nigeria
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 standard error.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Nigeria ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 53 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nigeria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3496 standard error 0.3496 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.2722 standard error 0.2722 standard error 0 standard error
2010s 0.2395 standard error 0.2395 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Nigeria or Zimbabwe?
Nigeria, at 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
0 standard error, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Zimbabwe?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Nigeria and Zimbabwe rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Nigeria ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.