Senegal vs Zimbabwe: Political Stability/No Violence
Senegal
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Zimbabwe
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Senegal rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Senegal
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Senegal ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Senegal | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3496 standard error | 0.3496 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.2766 standard error | 0.2722 standard error | 0.0044 standard error | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0.2395 standard error | 0.2395 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Senegal or Zimbabwe?
- Senegal, at 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Senegal and Zimbabwe?
- 0 standard error, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Senegal and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Senegal and Zimbabwe rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Senegal ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.