Centralization of Political Power Index in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.901 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Centralization of Political Power Index in Uzbekistan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, centralization of political power index in Uzbekistan stood at 0.901. That is the lowest value across all 237 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and down 7.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Uzbekistan peaked at 0.977 in 1999 and was at its lowest, 0.901, in 2025.
Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.941 | — |
| 1790 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.941 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.969 | +3.0% |
| 1922 | 0.969 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.969 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.97 | +0.1% |
| 1925 | 0.97 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.97 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.97 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.97 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.97 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.971 | +0.1% |
| 1931 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.964 | -0.7% |
| 1955 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.964 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.963 | -0.1% |
| 1981 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.963 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.96 | -0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.943 | -1.8% |
| 1988 | 0.942 | -0.1% |
| 1989 | 0.922 | -2.1% |
| 1990 | 0.928 | +0.7% |
| 1991 | 0.936 | +0.9% |
| 1992 | 0.969 | +3.5% |
| 1993 | 0.973 | +0.4% |
| 1994 | 0.973 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.973 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.974 | +0.1% |
| 1997 | 0.974 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.974 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.977 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.977 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.977 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.975 | -0.2% |
| 2003 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.975 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.974 | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 0.974 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.972 | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0.971 | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 0.971 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.973 | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 0.973 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.973 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.97 | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.971 | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 0.958 | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 0.925 | -3.4% |
| 2020 | 0.902 | -2.5% |
| 2021 | 0.912 | +1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.918 | +0.7% |
| 2023 | 0.919 | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 0.915 | -0.4% |
| 2025 | 0.901 | -1.5% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 0.901 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.5475, 1.6× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 0.901 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1585, 5.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.941 | 0.941 | 0.941 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.9668 | 0.941 | 0.97 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.971 | 0.971 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.971 | 0.971 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.9668 | 0.964 | 0.971 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.964 | 0.964 | 0.964 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9545 | 0.922 | 0.963 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.9651 | 0.928 | 0.977 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9752 | 0.974 | 0.977 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9657 | 0.925 | 0.973 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9112 | 0.901 | 0.919 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Uzbekistan?
- Centralization of political power index in Uzbekistan was 0.901 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.977 in 1999.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.901 in 2025.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for centralization of political power index?
- Uzbekistan ranks 20th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.