Centralization of Political Power Index in Cuba
Cuba: Centralization of Political Power Index was 0.899 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Centralization of Political Power Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.899 for centralization of political power index in 2025.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, centralization of political power index in Cuba peaked at 0.942 in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0.382, in 1941.
That places Cuba 21st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Centralization of Political Power Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.877 | — |
| 1790 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.876 | -0.1% |
| 1813 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.872 | -0.5% |
| 1838 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.809 | -7.2% |
| 1899 | 0.841 | +4.0% |
| 1900 | 0.708 | -15.8% |
| 1901 | 0.504 | -28.8% |
| 1902 | 0.463 | -8.1% |
| 1903 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.47 | +1.5% |
| 1907 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.474 | +0.9% |
| 1911 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.513 | +8.2% |
| 1927 | 0.513 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.574 | +11.9% |
| 1929 | 0.574 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.574 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.58 | +1.0% |
| 1932 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.581 | +0.2% |
| 1934 | 0.5 | -13.9% |
| 1935 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.424 | -15.2% |
| 1941 | 0.382 | -9.9% |
| 1942 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.409 | +7.1% |
| 1952 | 0.478 | +16.9% |
| 1953 | 0.683 | +42.9% |
| 1954 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.888 | +30.0% |
| 1960 | 0.942 | +6.1% |
| 1961 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.939 | -0.3% |
| 1977 | 0.905 | -3.6% |
| 1978 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.903 | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.892 | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.896 | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.886 | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.888 | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.887 | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 0.887 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.887 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.896 | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 0.901 | +0.6% |
| 2025 | 0.899 | -0.2% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.899 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.3495, 2.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.899 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.236, 3.8× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.8762 | 0.876 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.8748 | 0.872 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8626 | 0.809 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.4944 | 0.463 | 0.708 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.5018 | 0.474 | 0.574 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5315 | 0.5 | 0.581 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.3862 | 0.382 | 0.424 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6255 | 0.382 | 0.888 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.942 | 0.942 | 0.942 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.9306 | 0.905 | 0.942 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9048 | 0.903 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8959 | 0.886 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8928 | 0.887 | 0.901 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is centralization of political power index in Cuba?
- Centralization of political power index in Cuba was 0.899 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest centralization of political power index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.942 in 1960.
- What is the lowest centralization of political power index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.382 in 1941.
- How does Cuba rank for centralization of political power index?
- Cuba ranks 21st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is centralization of political power index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Centralization of Political Power Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the executive is unconstrained by the legislature, judiciary, electoral management body, and other oversight.