Political centralization index in Cuba
Cuba: Political centralization index was 0.899 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Latest (2025)
0.899
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
21st
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.942
in 1960
All-time low
0.382
in 1941
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Political centralization index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.899 for political centralization index in 2025.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, political centralization index in Cuba peaked at 0.942 in 1960 and was at its lowest, 0.382, in 1941.
That places Cuba 21st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Political centralization index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.877 | — |
| 1790 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.877 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.876 | -0.1% |
| 1813 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.872 | -0.5% |
| 1838 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.872 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.809 | -7.2% |
| 1899 | 0.841 | +4.0% |
| 1900 | 0.708 | -15.8% |
| 1901 | 0.504 | -28.8% |
| 1902 | 0.463 | -8.1% |
| 1903 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.463 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.47 | +1.5% |
| 1907 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.47 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.474 | +0.9% |
| 1911 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.474 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.513 | +8.2% |
| 1927 | 0.513 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.574 | +11.9% |
| 1929 | 0.574 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.574 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.58 | +1.0% |
| 1932 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.581 | +0.2% |
| 1934 | 0.5 | -13.9% |
| 1935 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.424 | -15.2% |
| 1941 | 0.382 | -9.9% |
| 1942 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.382 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.409 | +7.1% |
| 1952 | 0.478 | +16.9% |
| 1953 | 0.683 | +42.9% |
| 1954 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.683 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.888 | +30.0% |
| 1960 | 0.942 | +6.1% |
| 1961 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.942 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.939 | -0.3% |
| 1977 | 0.905 | -3.6% |
| 1978 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.905 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.903 | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.903 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.892 | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.896 | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.896 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.886 | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0.888 | +0.2% |
| 2020 | 0.887 | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 0.887 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.887 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.896 | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 0.901 | +0.6% |
| 2025 | 0.899 | -0.2% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.899 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.3495, 2.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.899 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.236, 3.8× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.877 | 0.877 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.8762 | 0.876 | 0.877 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.8748 | 0.872 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.872 | 0.872 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.8626 | 0.809 | 0.872 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.4944 | 0.463 | 0.708 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.474 | 0.474 | 0.474 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.5018 | 0.474 | 0.574 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5315 | 0.5 | 0.581 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.3862 | 0.382 | 0.424 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6255 | 0.382 | 0.888 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.942 | 0.942 | 0.942 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.9306 | 0.905 | 0.942 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.905 | 0.905 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9048 | 0.903 | 0.905 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8959 | 0.886 | 0.903 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8928 | 0.887 | 0.901 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is political centralization index in Cuba?
- Political centralization index in Cuba was 0.899 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest political centralization index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.942 in 1960.
- What is the lowest political centralization index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.382 in 1941.
- How does Cuba rank for political centralization index?
- Cuba ranks 21st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is political centralization index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Political centralization index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).