PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 by country

Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make...

Countries reporting
53
Highest
26.7%
Turkey
Lowest
12.4%
Macao
Median
21.4%
Years covered
16
2003–2018
Data points
303

What the numbers show

PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2 is currently reported for 53 countries. The highest value is 26.7% in Turkey; the lowest is 12.4% in Macao.

The median across all reporting countries is 21.4%, and the mean is 21.3%.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 2.

Over the past decade 26 countries rose and 27 fell. The largest increase was in Qatar (up 43.3%), and the largest decrease in Macao (down 32.3%).

PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Turkey 26.7% 2018 up 7.0% rising
2 Mexico 26.6% 2018 down 6.4% rising
3 Croatia 26.4% 2018 up 2.5% flat
4 Montenegro 26.4% 2018 up 4.4% rising
5 Uruguay 25.7% 2018 up 3.2% flat
6 Greece 25.2% 2018 up 2.1% flat
7 Chile 25.0% 2018 down 10.6% falling
8 Latvia 24.6% 2018 down 6.9% flat
9 Romania 23.9% 2018 down 12.3% falling
10 Russia 23.7% 2018 down 15.8% falling
11 Ireland 23.6% 2018 up 3.5% flat
12 Spain 23.4% 2018 up 3.6% flat
13 Lithuania 23.3% 2018 down 10.0% falling
14 Jordan 23.0% 2018 down 0.5% flat
15 Bulgaria 23.0% 2018 up 2.1% rising
16 Serbia 23.0% 2018 down 9.2% falling
17 Finland 23.0% 2018 up 42.4% rising
18 Hungary 22.9% 2018 up 4.0% flat
19 Colombia 22.7% 2018 down 5.5% flat
20 Thailand 22.6% 2018 down 15.9% falling
21 United States 22.5% 2018 down 1.4% flat
22 Australia 22.3% 2018 up 17.0% rising
23 Iceland 21.7% 2018 up 9.9% rising
24 New Zealand 21.6% 2018 up 18.9% rising
25 Sweden 21.5% 2018 down 7.6% flat
26 Czechia 21.4% 2018 down 12.2% flat
27 Denmark 21.4% 2018 down 1.6% rising
28 Slovenia 21.2% 2018 down 2.9% falling
29 Norway 21.2% 2018 down 10.5% falling
30 Luxembourg 21.1% 2018 up 3.7% flat
31 Slovakia 20.9% 2018 down 8.8% flat
32 Argentina 20.9% 2018 down 0.4% rising
33 United Kingdom 20.7% 2018 down 9.3% flat
34 Italy 20.6% 2018 down 9.1% falling
35 Poland 20.5% 2018 down 9.6% falling
36 France 20.4% 2018 up 14.1% rising
37 Canada 20.2% 2018 up 13.5% rising
38 Austria 20.1% 2018 up 0.9% flat
39 Estonia 19.9% 2018 down 7.8% falling
40 Germany 19.8% 2018 up 11.4% rising
41 Portugal 19.7% 2018 down 11.7% falling
42 Netherlands 19.0% 2018 up 5.5% rising
43 Israel 18.9% 2018 down 4.0% falling
44 Switzerland 18.9% 2018 up 30.3% rising
45 Brazil 18.5% 2018 down 9.1% rising
46 Belgium 18.4% 2018 up 8.0% rising
47 Qatar 17.6% 2018 up 43.3% rising
48 Indonesia 17.6% 2018 up 11.3% rising
49 Japan 17.5% 2018 up 4.7% flat
50 Tunisia 17.3% 2015 down 3.0% rising
51 South Korea 16.9% 2018 up 14.4% rising
52 Hong Kong 14.1% 2018 up 13.7% rising
53 Macao 12.4% 2018 down 32.3% falling

About this data

Indicator
PISA: Male 15-year-olds by mathematics proficiency level (%). Level 2
Source
OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 303 data points, 2003–2018
Last refreshed

Percentage of 15-year-old male students scoring higher than 420 but lower than or equal to 482 points on the PISA mathematics scale. At Level 2, students can interpret and recognize situations in contexts that require no more than direct inference. They can extract relevant information from a single source and make use of a single representational mode. Students at this level can employ basic algorithms, formulae, procedures, or conventions to solve problems involving whole numbers. They are capable of making literal interpretations of the results. Data reflects country performance in the stated year according to PISA reports, but may not be comparable across years or countries. Consult the PISA website for more detailed information: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/