Statizoid

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya

Libya: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction was 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0.4286 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
81st
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.4286 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0.4286 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya, 2015–2019

00.10.20.30.42015201720192015: 0.429 DB17-20 methodology2016: 0.429 DB17-20 methodology2017: 0.429 DB17-20 methodology2018: 0.429 DB17-20 methodology2019: 0.429 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya is 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Libya ranks 81st of 180 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 78 Bhutan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 79 Guinea-Bissau 1.86 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 80 Myanmar 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 82 China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  5. 82 India 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 82 Indonesia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  7. 82 Nigeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  8. 82 United States 0 DB17-20 methodology
  9. 82 Japan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  10. 82 Algeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  11. 82 Angola 0 DB17-20 methodology
  12. 82 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB17-20 methodology
  13. 82 Argentina 0 DB17-20 methodology
  14. 82 Armenia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  15. 82 Australia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  16. 82 Austria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  17. 82 Azerbaijan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  18. 82 Barbados 0 DB17-20 methodology
  19. 82 Belarus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  20. 82 Belgium 0 DB17-20 methodology
  21. 82 Benin 0 DB17-20 methodology
  22. 82 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 DB17-20 methodology
  23. 82 Botswana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  24. 82 Burkina Faso 0 DB17-20 methodology
  25. 82 Cabo Verde 0 DB17-20 methodology
  26. 82 Cameroon 0 DB17-20 methodology
  27. 82 Chile 0 DB17-20 methodology
  28. 82 Colombia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  29. 82 Costa Rica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  30. 82 Côte d'Ivoire 0 DB17-20 methodology
  31. 82 Cyprus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  32. 82 Czechia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  33. 82 Dominica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  34. 82 Ecuador 0 DB17-20 methodology
  35. 82 El Salvador 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  36. 82 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  37. 82 Eritrea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  38. 82 Estonia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  39. 82 Eswatini 0 DB17-20 methodology
  40. 82 Ethiopia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  41. 82 Fiji 0 DB17-20 methodology
  42. 82 Finland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  43. 82 France 0 DB17-20 methodology
  44. 82 Gambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  45. 82 Georgia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  46. 82 Germany 0 DB17-20 methodology
  47. 82 Ghana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  48. 82 Greece 0 DB17-20 methodology
  49. 82 Grenada 0 DB17-20 methodology
  50. 82 Haiti 0 DB17-20 methodology
  51. 82 Hong Kong (China) 0 DB17-20 methodology
  52. 82 Hungary 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  53. 82 Iceland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  54. 82 Ireland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  55. 82 Israel 0 DB17-20 methodology
  56. 82 Italy 0 DB17-20 methodology
  57. 82 Kazakhstan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  58. 82 Republic of Korea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  59. 82 Latvia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  60. 82 Liberia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  61. 82 Lithuania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  62. 82 Maldives 0 DB17-20 methodology
  63. 82 Mauritius 0 DB17-20 methodology
  64. 82 Republic of Moldova 0 DB17-20 methodology
  65. 82 Mongolia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  66. 82 Morocco 0 DB17-20 methodology
  67. 82 Namibia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  68. 82 New Zealand 0 DB17-20 methodology
  69. 82 Nicaragua 0 DB17-20 methodology
  70. 82 Oman 0 DB17-20 methodology
  71. 82 Papua New Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  72. 82 Paraguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  73. 82 Philippines 0 DB17-20 methodology
  74. 82 Portugal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  75. 82 Romania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  76. 82 Samoa 0 DB17-20 methodology
  77. 82 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB17-20 methodology
  78. 82 Senegal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  79. 82 Serbia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  80. 82 Seychelles 0 DB17-20 methodology
  81. 82 Sierra Leone 0 DB17-20 methodology
  82. 82 Slovak Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology
  83. 82 Solomon Islands 0 DB17-20 methodology
  84. 82 South Sudan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  85. 82 Spain 0 DB17-20 methodology
  86. 82 Sri Lanka 0 DB17-20 methodology
  87. 82 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB17-20 methodology
  88. 82 Suriname 0 DB17-20 methodology
  89. 82 Sweden 0 DB17-20 methodology
  90. 82 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology
  91. 82 Taïwan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  92. 82 United Republic of Tanzania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  93. 82 Thailand 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  94. 82 Tunisia 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  95. 82 Türkiye 0 DB17-20 methodology
  96. 82 Ukraine 0 DB17-20 methodology
  97. 82 Uruguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  98. 82 Uzbekistan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  99. 82 Viet Nam 0 DB17-20 methodology
  100. 82 Yemen 0 DB17-20 methodology
  101. 82 Zambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  102. 82 Zimbabwe 0 DB17-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More reference data data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya?
Paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya was 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Libya rank for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
Libya ranks 81st out of 180 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/libya/">Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Libya</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 900 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.