Statizoid

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar

Myanmar: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction was 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0.7143 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
81st
of 181 countries
All-time high
0.7143 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0.7143 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.82015201720192015: 0.714 DB17-20 methodology2016: 0.714 DB17-20 methodology2017: 0.714 DB17-20 methodology2018: 0.714 DB17-20 methodology2019: 0.714 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Myanmar recorded 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Myanmar ranks 81st of 181 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar, year by year

Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology —
2016 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Myanmar

  1. 78 Netherlands 2.14 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 79 Bhutan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 80 Guinea-Bissau 1.86 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 82 Libya 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 83 China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  6. 83 India 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 83 Indonesia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  8. 83 Nigeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  9. 83 United States of America 0 DB17-20 methodology
  10. 83 Japan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  11. 83 Algeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  12. 83 Angola 0 DB17-20 methodology
  13. 83 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB17-20 methodology
  14. 83 Argentina 0 DB17-20 methodology
  15. 83 Armenia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  16. 83 Australia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  17. 83 Austria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  18. 83 Azerbaijan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  19. 83 Barbados 0 DB17-20 methodology
  20. 83 Belarus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  21. 83 Belgium 0 DB17-20 methodology
  22. 83 Benin 0 DB17-20 methodology
  23. 83 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0 DB17-20 methodology
  24. 83 Botswana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  25. 83 Burkina Faso 0 DB17-20 methodology
  26. 83 Cape Verde 0 DB17-20 methodology
  27. 83 Cameroon 0 DB17-20 methodology
  28. 83 Chile 0 DB17-20 methodology
  29. 83 Colombia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  30. 83 Costa Rica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  31. 83 Côte d'Ivoire 0 DB17-20 methodology
  32. 83 Cyprus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  33. 83 Czechia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  34. 83 Dominica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  35. 83 Ecuador 0 DB17-20 methodology
  36. 83 El Salvador 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  37. 83 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  38. 83 Eritrea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  39. 83 Estonia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  40. 83 Eswatini 0 DB17-20 methodology
  41. 83 Ethiopia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  42. 83 Fiji 0 DB17-20 methodology
  43. 83 Finland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  44. 83 France 0 DB17-20 methodology
  45. 83 Gambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  46. 83 Georgia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  47. 83 Germany 0 DB17-20 methodology
  48. 83 Ghana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  49. 83 Greece 0 DB17-20 methodology
  50. 83 Grenada 0 DB17-20 methodology
  51. 83 Haiti 0 DB17-20 methodology
  52. 83 Hong Kong, China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  53. 83 Hungary 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  54. 83 Iceland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  55. 83 Ireland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  56. 83 Israel 0 DB17-20 methodology
  57. 83 Italy 0 DB17-20 methodology
  58. 83 Kazakhstan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  59. 83 Republic of Korea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  60. 83 Latvia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  61. 83 Liberia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  62. 83 Lithuania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  63. 83 Maldives 0 DB17-20 methodology
  64. 83 Mauritius 0 DB17-20 methodology
  65. 83 Republic of Moldova 0 DB17-20 methodology
  66. 83 Mongolia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  67. 83 Morocco 0 DB17-20 methodology
  68. 83 Namibia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  69. 83 New Zealand 0 DB17-20 methodology
  70. 83 Nicaragua 0 DB17-20 methodology
  71. 83 Oman 0 DB17-20 methodology
  72. 83 Papua New Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  73. 83 Paraguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  74. 83 Philippines 0 DB17-20 methodology
  75. 83 Portugal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  76. 83 Romania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  77. 83 Samoa 0 DB17-20 methodology
  78. 83 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB17-20 methodology
  79. 83 Senegal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  80. 83 Serbia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  81. 83 Seychelles 0 DB17-20 methodology
  82. 83 Sierra Leone 0 DB17-20 methodology
  83. 83 Slovakia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  84. 83 Solomon Islands 0 DB17-20 methodology
  85. 83 South Sudan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  86. 83 Spain 0 DB17-20 methodology
  87. 83 Sri Lanka 0 DB17-20 methodology
  88. 83 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB17-20 methodology
  89. 83 Suriname 0 DB17-20 methodology
  90. 83 Sweden 0 DB17-20 methodology
  91. 83 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology
  92. 83 Taiwan, China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  93. 83 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology
  94. 83 Thailand 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  95. 83 Tunisia 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  96. 83 Türkiye 0 DB17-20 methodology
  97. 83 Ukraine 0 DB17-20 methodology
  98. 83 Uruguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  99. 83 Uzbekistan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  100. 83 Viet Nam 0 DB17-20 methodology
  101. 83 Yemen 0 DB17-20 methodology
  102. 83 Zambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  103. 83 Zimbabwe 0 DB17-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 181 places →

More reference data data for Myanmar

All data for Myanmar →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar?
Paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar was 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in Myanmar?
The highest recorded value was 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in Myanmar?
The lowest recorded value was 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Myanmar rank for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
Myanmar ranks 81st out of 181 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/myanmar/">Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in Myanmar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 905 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.