Statizoid

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India

India: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction was 0 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
0 DB17-20 methodology
World rank
83rd
of 181 countries
All-time high
27.71 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2017
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 27.7 DB17-20 methodology2016: 27.7 DB17-20 methodology2017: 0 DB17-20 methodology2018: 0 DB17-20 methodology2019: 0 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India is 0 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over five years.

That places India 83rd out of 181 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India, year by year

Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 27.71 DB17-20 methodology —
2016 27.71 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 0 DB17-20 methodology -100.0%
2018 0 DB17-20 methodology —
2019 0 DB17-20 methodology —

Countries ranked near India

  1. 80 Guinea-Bissau 1.86 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 81 Myanmar 0.7143 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 82 Libya 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 83 China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  5. 83 Indonesia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  6. 83 Nigeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  7. 83 United States of America 0 DB17-20 methodology
  8. 83 Japan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  9. 83 Algeria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  10. 83 Angola 0 DB17-20 methodology
  11. 83 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB17-20 methodology
  12. 83 Argentina 0 DB17-20 methodology
  13. 83 Armenia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  14. 83 Australia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  15. 83 Austria 0 DB17-20 methodology
  16. 83 Azerbaijan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  17. 83 Barbados 0 DB17-20 methodology
  18. 83 Belarus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  19. 83 Belgium 0 DB17-20 methodology
  20. 83 Benin 0 DB17-20 methodology
  21. 83 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0 DB17-20 methodology
  22. 83 Botswana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  23. 83 Burkina Faso 0 DB17-20 methodology
  24. 83 Cape Verde 0 DB17-20 methodology
  25. 83 Cameroon 0 DB17-20 methodology
  26. 83 Chile 0 DB17-20 methodology
  27. 83 Colombia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  28. 83 Costa Rica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  29. 83 Côte d'Ivoire 0 DB17-20 methodology
  30. 83 Cyprus 0 DB17-20 methodology
  31. 83 Czechia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  32. 83 Dominica 0 DB17-20 methodology
  33. 83 Ecuador 0 DB17-20 methodology
  34. 83 El Salvador 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  35. 83 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  36. 83 Eritrea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  37. 83 Estonia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  38. 83 Eswatini 0 DB17-20 methodology
  39. 83 Ethiopia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  40. 83 Fiji 0 DB17-20 methodology
  41. 83 Finland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  42. 83 France 0 DB17-20 methodology
  43. 83 Gambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  44. 83 Georgia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  45. 83 Germany 0 DB17-20 methodology
  46. 83 Ghana 0 DB17-20 methodology
  47. 83 Greece 0 DB17-20 methodology
  48. 83 Grenada 0 DB17-20 methodology
  49. 83 Haiti 0 DB17-20 methodology
  50. 83 Hong Kong, China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  51. 83 Hungary 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  52. 83 Iceland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  53. 83 Ireland 0 DB17-20 methodology
  54. 83 Israel 0 DB17-20 methodology
  55. 83 Italy 0 DB17-20 methodology
  56. 83 Kazakhstan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  57. 83 Republic of Korea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  58. 83 Latvia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  59. 83 Liberia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  60. 83 Lithuania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  61. 83 Maldives 0 DB17-20 methodology
  62. 83 Mauritius 0 DB17-20 methodology
  63. 83 Republic of Moldova 0 DB17-20 methodology
  64. 83 Mongolia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  65. 83 Morocco 0 DB17-20 methodology
  66. 83 Namibia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  67. 83 New Zealand 0 DB17-20 methodology
  68. 83 Nicaragua 0 DB17-20 methodology
  69. 83 Oman 0 DB17-20 methodology
  70. 83 Papua New Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology
  71. 83 Paraguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  72. 83 Philippines 0 DB17-20 methodology
  73. 83 Portugal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  74. 83 Romania 0 DB17-20 methodology
  75. 83 Samoa 0 DB17-20 methodology
  76. 83 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB17-20 methodology
  77. 83 Senegal 0 DB17-20 methodology
  78. 83 Serbia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  79. 83 Seychelles 0 DB17-20 methodology
  80. 83 Sierra Leone 0 DB17-20 methodology
  81. 83 Slovakia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  82. 83 Solomon Islands 0 DB17-20 methodology
  83. 83 South Sudan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  84. 83 Spain 0 DB17-20 methodology
  85. 83 Sri Lanka 0 DB17-20 methodology
  86. 83 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB17-20 methodology
  87. 83 Suriname 0 DB17-20 methodology
  88. 83 Sweden 0 DB17-20 methodology
  89. 83 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology
  90. 83 Taiwan, China 0 DB17-20 methodology
  91. 83 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology
  92. 83 Thailand 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  93. 83 Tunisia 0 DB17-20 methodology compare
  94. 83 Türkiye 0 DB17-20 methodology
  95. 83 Ukraine 0 DB17-20 methodology
  96. 83 Uruguay 0 DB17-20 methodology
  97. 83 Uzbekistan 0 DB17-20 methodology
  98. 83 Viet Nam 0 DB17-20 methodology
  99. 83 Yemen 0 DB17-20 methodology
  100. 83 Zambia 0 DB17-20 methodology
  101. 83 Zimbabwe 0 DB17-20 methodology

See the full ranking of 181 places →

More reference data data for India

All data for India →

Frequently asked questions

What is paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India?
Paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India was 0 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in India?
The highest recorded value was 27.71 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction recorded in India?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
How does India rank for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
India ranks 83rd out of 181 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this India data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/paying-taxes-time-to-complete-a-corporate-income-tax-correction-weeks-db17-20-methodology/india/">Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction in India</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
181 places, 905 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.