Libya vs Tunisia: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Libya
- Tunisia
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia, a difference of 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Tunisia ahead.
Libya ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Libya or Tunisia?
- Libya, at 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Libya and Tunisia?
- 0.4286 DB17-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Tunisia rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Libya ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.