Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia
Croatia: Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure was 0.0% in 2015. ◆ Volatile
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia, 1999–2015
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2015, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia peaked at 12.6% in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2015.
Croatia ranks 50th of 53 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 0.2% | — |
| 2007 | 5.8% | +3015.4% |
| 2008 | 6.6% | +13.0% |
| 2009 | 11.6% | +76.4% |
| 2010 | 12.6% | +9.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0% | -100.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1 |
| 2000s | 8.0% | 5.8% | 11.6% | 3 |
| 2010s | 6.3% | 0.0% | 12.6% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia?
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in Croatia was 0.0% in 2015, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 12.6% in 2010.
- What is the lowest non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2015.
- How does Croatia rank for non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure?
- Croatia ranks 50th out of 53 countries with data for 2015.
- Is non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Non-teacher (e.g. school directors, support staff, administrative staff in local or central Ministries) compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate the indicator, divide non-teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/