Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mongolia
Mongolia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Mongolia, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Mongolia recorded -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2025.
That represents a change of up 25.5% on the previous year and up 14.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mongolia peaked at -0.1785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -0.6271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Mongolia 126th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.6181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.6266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.4% |
| 2000 | -0.6271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2002 | -0.4344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -30.7% |
| 2003 | -0.4487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.4074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2005 | -0.5206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.8% |
| 2006 | -0.4954 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2007 | -0.5927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.6% |
| 2008 | -0.3141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -47.0% |
| 2009 | -0.4526 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +44.1% |
| 2010 | -0.3831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2011 | -0.3903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2012 | -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2013 | -0.3646 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.7% |
| 2014 | -0.2045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -43.9% |
| 2015 | -0.2398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.3% |
| 2016 | -0.264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.1% |
| 2017 | -0.3401 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.8% |
| 2018 | -0.1785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -47.5% |
| 2019 | -0.2175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +21.8% |
| 2020 | -0.2399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.3% |
| 2021 | -0.2801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.8% |
| 2022 | -0.2533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.6% |
| 2023 | -0.2505 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2024 | -0.276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.2% |
| 2025 | -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.5% |
Mongolia compared with similar countries
- Mongolia's -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 8.9× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Mongolia's -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.1855 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
More reference data data for Mongolia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8173 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0069 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 12.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0378 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mongolia?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mongolia was -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was -0.1785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Mongolia rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Mongolia ranks 126th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.