El Salvador vs Mongolia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

El Salvador
-0.2354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mongolia
-0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
El Salvador rank
128th
Mongolia rank
126th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Mongolia
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102025

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.

El Salvador ranks 128th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2000s -0.5881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.477 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2010s -0.1331 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2982 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1651 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.2507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, El Salvador or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at -0.2056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2354 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in El Salvador as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between El Salvador and Mongolia?
0.0298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
El Salvador ranks 128th and Mongolia ranks 126th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Mongolia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/el-salvador/mongolia/">El Salvador vs Mongolia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.