Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Uzbekistan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Uzbekistan stood at -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.6% on the previous year and up 72.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Uzbekistan peaked at -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
That places Uzbekistan 125th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2000 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2002 | -1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.8% |
| 2003 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2004 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.3% |
| 2005 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2006 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2007 | -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.5% |
| 2008 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.5% |
| 2009 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.6% |
| 2010 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.0% |
| 2011 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.0% |
| 2012 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2013 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2014 | -0.713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -39.8% |
| 2015 | -0.6993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2016 | -0.6745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2017 | -0.6048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.3% |
| 2018 | -0.5916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2019 | -0.5551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2020 | -0.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +26.1% |
| 2021 | -0.259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -63.0% |
| 2022 | -0.3339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +28.9% |
| 2023 | -0.2581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.7% |
| 2024 | -0.2034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -21.2% |
| 2025 | -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 31% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +63.0% | -0.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2014 | +39.8% | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.8621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Uzbekistan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Uzbekistan was -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.77 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Uzbekistan ranks 125th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 72.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.