Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Mauritius, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Mauritius recorded 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is down 5.8% on the previous year and down 27.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mauritius peaked at 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
Mauritius ranks 48th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.3329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2000 | 0.3708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.9% |
| 2002 | 0.5316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +43.4% |
| 2003 | 0.5437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.5641 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2005 | 0.5969 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.8% |
| 2006 | 0.5873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2007 | 0.5869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2008 | 0.991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +68.8% |
| 2009 | 0.9598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.2% |
| 2010 | 0.873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2011 | 0.844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2012 | 1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +27.8% |
| 2013 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.7% |
| 2014 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.1% |
| 2015 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2017 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2018 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.9897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.2% |
| 2020 | 0.9564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2021 | 0.8717 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.9% |
| 2022 | 0.8388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2023 | 0.9232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.1% |
| 2024 | 0.9126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1% |
| 2025 | 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.8% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Mauritius changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | +68.8% | 0.5869 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2002 | +43.4% | 0.3708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.6369 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.844 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8388 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9564 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mauritius?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Mauritius was 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2016.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Mauritius rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Mauritius ranks 48th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.