American Samoa vs Mauritius: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- American Samoa
- Mauritius
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 0.7674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
American Samoa ranks 47th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 204 groups.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6694 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.5548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3882 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.7674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, American Samoa or Mauritius?
- American Samoa, at 0.7674 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between American Samoa and Mauritius?
- 0.002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Mauritius?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Mauritius rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- American Samoa ranks 47th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 204 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.