Latvia vs Mauritius: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Latvia
0.8291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritius
0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Latvia rank
50th
Mauritius rank
48th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Latvia
  • Mauritius
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.

Latvia ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 206 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4488 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2000s 0.3337 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6369 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2010s 0.7066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.8074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Latvia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.8599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8291 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Latvia and Mauritius?
0.0308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Latvia ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Mauritius: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/latvia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/latvia/mauritius/">Latvia vs Mauritius: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.