Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan is -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 7.3% on the previous year and down 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan peaked at -0.3137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2022.
That places Kyrgyzstan 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.3137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2000 | -0.3699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.1% |
| 2002 | -0.6861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +85.5% |
| 2003 | -0.6886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2004 | -0.5865 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.8% |
| 2005 | -0.7353 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.4% |
| 2006 | -0.9214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.3% |
| 2007 | -0.8075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.4% |
| 2008 | -0.8905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.3% |
| 2009 | -0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.5% |
| 2010 | -0.7588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.5% |
| 2011 | -0.8075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.4% |
| 2012 | -0.8098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2013 | -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2014 | -0.7393 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2015 | -0.7652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2016 | -0.7841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2017 | -0.6246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.3% |
| 2018 | -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.4% |
| 2019 | -0.5744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.3% |
| 2020 | -0.5767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2021 | -0.9116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +58.1% |
| 2022 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.2% |
| 2023 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2024 | -0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.4% |
| 2025 | -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6398 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.7352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.7127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8098 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5767 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kyrgyzstan was -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.3137 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 172nd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.