Kyrgyzstan vs Niger: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kyrgyzstan
-0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Niger
-0.8645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
172nd
Niger rank
174th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Niger
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620102025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Niger, a difference of 0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 172nd and Niger ranks 174th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Niger Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2000s -0.7352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1822 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kyrgyzstan
2010s -0.7127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.011 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Niger
2020s -0.8895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kyrgyzstan or Niger?
Kyrgyzstan, at -0.8504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kyrgyzstan and Niger?
0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Niger?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Niger rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 172nd and Niger ranks 174th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Niger: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kyrgyz-republic/niger/">Kyrgyzstan vs Niger: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.