Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Kazakhstan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is up 41.8% on the previous year and up 179.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.1152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.
Kazakhstan ranks 101st of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.4% |
| 2000 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2002 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.6% |
| 2003 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2004 | -0.9762 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2005 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2006 | -0.9661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2007 | -0.9756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2008 | -0.7946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2009 | -0.733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.8% |
| 2010 | -0.7611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2011 | -0.7206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2012 | -0.6094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.4% |
| 2013 | -0.5972 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2014 | -0.1265 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -78.8% |
| 2015 | -0.1302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2016 | -0.2086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +60.2% |
| 2017 | -0.1115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -46.5% |
| 2018 | -0.1946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +74.5% |
| 2019 | -0.0332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -82.9% |
| 2020 | -0.015 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -54.9% |
| 2021 | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +176.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -328.3% |
| 2023 | 0.1152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +22.1% |
| 2024 | 0.0726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -37.0% |
| 2025 | 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +41.8% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 12% of the median. (54 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +328.3% | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2021 | -176.1% | -0.015 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.733 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.3493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0413 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kazakhstan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Kazakhstan was 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 101st out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 179.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.