Kazakhstan vs Nauru: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Kazakhstan
0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Nauru
0.0795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
101st
Nauru rank
103rd

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Nauru
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102025

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru, a difference of 0.0234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.3 times Nauru's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Nauru ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 101st and Nauru ranks 103rd of 206 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Nauru Difference Ahead
2000s -0.8344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.366 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4684 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2010s -0.3493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2183 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2020s 0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Kazakhstan or Nauru?
Kazakhstan, at 0.1029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nauru as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Kazakhstan and Nauru?
0.0234 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Nauru?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Kazakhstan and Nauru rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Kazakhstan ranks 101st and Nauru ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Nauru: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/kazakhstan/naoero/">Kazakhstan vs Nauru: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.