Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate was 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Azerbaijan, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Azerbaijan recorded 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for government effectiveness - governance estimate in 2024. That is the highest value across all 26 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 153.1% on the previous year and up 139.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Azerbaijan peaked at 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024 and was at its lowest, -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
That places Azerbaijan 90th out of 205 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2000 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.3% |
| 2002 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.5% |
| 2003 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2004 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.1% |
| 2005 | -0.9042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.4% |
| 2006 | -0.8635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2007 | -0.8094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2008 | -0.8224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2009 | -0.726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.7% |
| 2010 | -0.8597 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.4% |
| 2011 | -0.7959 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.4% |
| 2012 | -0.8083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2013 | -0.6064 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -25.0% |
| 2014 | -0.4255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.8% |
| 2015 | -0.3537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.9% |
| 2016 | -0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -64.3% |
| 2017 | -0.1355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.3% |
| 2018 | -0.1559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.0% |
| 2019 | -0.0556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -64.3% |
| 2020 | -0.057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2021 | -0.057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2022 | -0.0544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -220.8% |
| 2024 | 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +153.1% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.7432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 22% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Azerbaijan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | +220.8% | -0.0544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2024 | +153.1% | 0.0656 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.9948 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.726 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8597 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0556 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
More reference data data for Azerbaijan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Azerbaijan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Azerbaijan was 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Azerbaijan ranks 90th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 139.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.