Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea stood at -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and down 12.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea peaked at -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014 and was at its lowest, -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 188th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2000 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2003 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2004 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2005 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2006 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.3% |
| 2009 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2010 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.8% |
| 2011 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2012 | -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2014 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -24.3% |
| 2015 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2016 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
| 2017 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2018 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.4% |
| 2019 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2020 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2021 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2022 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.9% |
| 2023 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2024 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2025 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 53.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More reference data data for Equatorial Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0013 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0083 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0044 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0316 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0402 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0358 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 1.11 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Equatorial Guinea was -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2014.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 188th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.