Equatorial Guinea vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Equatorial Guinea
-1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Korea
-1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
186th
North Korea rank
189th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • North Korea
-2.5-2-1.5-1199620102024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Korea, a difference of 0.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and North Korea ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea North Korea Difference Ahead
1990s -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2000s -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2010s -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2020s -1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Equatorial Guinea or North Korea?
Equatorial Guinea, at -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Equatorial Guinea and North Korea?
0.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and North Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and North Korea rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 186th and North Korea ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Equatorial Guinea vs North Korea: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.