Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate was -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Turkmenistan, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for government effectiveness - governance estimate in Turkmenistan is -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 118.3% on the previous year and down 74.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Turkmenistan peaked at -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2005.
Turkmenistan ranks 181st of 205 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Turkmenistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2000 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2002 | -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +31.7% |
| 2003 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2004 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -14.4% |
| 2005 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.8% |
| 2006 | -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.0% |
| 2007 | -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2008 | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2% |
| 2009 | -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2010 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.0% |
| 2011 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.9% |
| 2013 | -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.5% |
| 2014 | -0.6087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -54.6% |
| 2015 | -0.6118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2016 | -0.7981 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +30.5% |
| 2017 | -0.8883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.3% |
| 2018 | -0.9218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.8% |
| 2019 | -0.8218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.9% |
| 2020 | -0.9867 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.1% |
| 2021 | -0.9853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2022 | -0.4858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -50.7% |
| 2023 | -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2024 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +118.3% |
Turkmenistan compared with similar countries
- Turkmenistan's -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 11.5× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Turkmenistan's -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.7432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Turkmenistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -118.3% | -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.8004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Turkmenistan
More reference data data for Turkmenistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6549 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5864 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Turkmenistan?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Turkmenistan was -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.74 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2005.
- How does Turkmenistan rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Turkmenistan ranks 181st out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Turkmenistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Turkmenistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.