Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Azerbaijan
0.1253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Jordan
0.1113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
98th
Jordan rank
99th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Jordan
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102025

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.1253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan, a difference of 0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Jordan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 99th of 206 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1282 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jordan
2000s -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jordan
2010s -0.4805 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1636 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jordan
2020s -0.0727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1275 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Azerbaijan or Jordan?
Azerbaijan, at 0.1253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1113 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Azerbaijan and Jordan?
0.014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Jordan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Azerbaijan and Jordan rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Azerbaijan ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 99th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/azerbaijan/jordan/">Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.