Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania

Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 79.51 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
79.51
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
19th
of 191 countries
All-time high
79.51
in 2008
All-time low
77.05
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 772004: 772005: 772006: 772007: 772008: 79.52009: 79.52010: 79.52011: 79.52012: 79.52013: 79.52014: 79.52015: 79.52016: 79.52017: 79.52018: 79.52019: 79.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Mauritania is 79.51, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Mauritania peaked at 79.51 in 2008 and was at its lowest, 77.05, in 2003.

Mauritania ranks 19th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 77.05
2004 77.05 +0.0%
2005 77.05 +0.0%
2006 77.05 +0.0%
2007 77.05 +0.0%
2008 79.51 +3.2%
2009 79.51 +0.0%
2010 79.51 +0.0%
2011 79.51 +0.0%
2012 79.51 +0.0%
2013 79.51 +0.0%
2014 79.51 +0.0%
2015 79.51 +0.0%
2016 79.51 +0.0%
2017 79.51 +0.0%
2018 79.51 +0.0%
2019 79.51 +0.0%

Mauritania compared with similar countries

  • Mauritania's 79.51 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.3× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Mauritania's 79.51 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 77.75 77.05 79.51 7
2010s 79.51 79.51 79.51 10

Countries ranked near Mauritania

  1. 16 Mexico 81.91 compare
  2. 17 Tonga 81.15 compare
  3. 18 Japan 80.33 compare
  4. 19 Kazakhstan 79.51 compare
  5. 19 Lithuania 79.51 compare
  6. 22 Mongolia 79.18 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Mauritania

All data for Mauritania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Mauritania?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Mauritania was 79.51 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Mauritania?
The highest recorded value was 79.51 in 2008.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Mauritania?
The lowest recorded value was 77.05 in 2003.
How does Mauritania rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Mauritania ranks 19th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Mauritania?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mauritania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/mauritania/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Mauritania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.