Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan

Japan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 80.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
80.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
18th
of 191 countries
All-time high
80.33
in 2003
All-time low
80.33
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 80.32004: 80.32005: 80.32006: 80.32007: 80.32008: 80.32009: 80.32010: 80.32011: 80.32012: 80.32013: 80.32014: 80.32015: 80.32016: 80.32017: 80.32018: 80.32019: 80.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Japan is 80.33, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Japan peaked at 80.33 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 80.33, in 2003.

That places Japan 18th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 80.33
2004 80.33 +0.0%
2005 80.33 +0.0%
2006 80.33 +0.0%
2007 80.33 +0.0%
2008 80.33 +0.0%
2009 80.33 +0.0%
2010 80.33 +0.0%
2011 80.33 +0.0%
2012 80.33 +0.0%
2013 80.33 +0.0%
2014 80.33 +0.0%
2015 80.33 +0.0%
2016 80.33 +0.0%
2017 80.33 +0.0%
2018 80.33 +0.0%
2019 80.33 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 80.33 is above the median for high income countries, which is 64.39, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 80.33 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 1.1× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 80.33 80.33 80.33 7
2010s 80.33 80.33 80.33 10

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 15 Russia 82.21 compare
  2. 16 Mexico 81.91 compare
  3. 17 Tonga 81.15 compare
  4. 19 Kazakhstan 79.51 compare
  5. 19 Lithuania 79.51 compare
  6. 19 Mauritania 79.51 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Japan?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Japan was 80.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 80.33 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 80.33 in 2003.
How does Japan rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Japan ranks 18th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/japan/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.