Kazakhstan vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Kazakhstan
79.51
in 2019
Mauritania
79.51
in 2019
Kazakhstan rank
17th
Mauritania rank
17th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Mauritania
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 79.51 against 79.51 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mauritania ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 188 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 77.4 77.75 0.3513 Mauritania
2010s 79.34 79.51 0.1639 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Kazakhstan or Mauritania?
Kazakhstan, at 79.51 against 79.51 in Mauritania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Kazakhstan and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Kazakhstan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.