Japan vs Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Japan
80.33
in 2019
Mauritania
79.51
in 2019
Japan rank
16th
Mauritania rank
17th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Japan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 80.33 against 79.51 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.82.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 16th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.33 | 77.75 | 2.58 | Japan |
| 2010s | 80.33 | 79.51 | 0.8197 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Japan or Mauritania?
- Japan, at 80.33 against 79.51 in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Japan and Mauritania?
- 0.82, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mauritania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Mauritania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Japan ranks 16th and Mauritania ranks 17th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.