Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia

Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 75 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
37th
of 191 countries
All-time high
75
in 2011
All-time low
60.66
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 60.72004: 60.72005: 60.72006: 60.72007: 60.72008: 60.72009: 61.92010: 61.92011: 752012: 752013: 752014: 752015: 752016: 752017: 752018: 752019: 75

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Malaysia recorded 75 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 21.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Malaysia peaked at 75 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 60.66, in 2003.

Malaysia ranks 37th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 60.66
2004 60.66 +0.0%
2005 60.66 +0.0%
2006 60.66 +0.0%
2007 60.66 +0.0%
2008 60.66 +0.0%
2009 61.89 +2.0%
2010 61.89 +0.0%
2011 75 +21.2%
2012 75 +0.0%
2013 75 +0.0%
2014 75 +0.0%
2015 75 +0.0%
2016 75 +0.0%
2017 75 +0.0%
2018 75 +0.0%
2019 75 +0.0%

Malaysia compared with similar countries

  • Malaysia's 75 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 61.68, 1.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Malaysia's 75 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 60.83 60.66 61.89 7
2010s 73.69 61.89 75 10

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 35 Iceland 75.66 compare
  2. 36 Thailand 75.41 compare
  3. 37 Cape Verde 75 compare
  4. 39 Tajikistan 74.59 compare
  5. 39 Vanuatu 74.59 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Malaysia?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Malaysia was 75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 75 in 2011.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 60.66 in 2003.
How does Malaysia rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Malaysia ranks 37th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Malaysia?
Over the last ten years it is up 21.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/malaysia/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Malaysia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.