Malaysia vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Malaysia
75
in 2019
Tajikistan
74.59
in 2019
Malaysia rank
35th
Tajikistan rank
37th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 75 against 74.59 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.41.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Malaysia ranks 35th and Tajikistan ranks 37th of 188 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.9 | 74.59 | 13.69 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 73.69 | 74.59 | 0.9017 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Malaysia or Tajikistan?
- Malaysia, at 75 against 74.59 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Malaysia and Tajikistan?
- 0.41, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 35th and Tajikistan ranks 37th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.