Iceland vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Iceland
75.66
in 2019
Malaysia
75
in 2019
Iceland rank
35th
Malaysia rank
37th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 75.66 against 75 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.66.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 191 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.3 | 60.86 | 16.43 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 75.66 | 73.69 | 1.97 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Iceland or Malaysia?
- Iceland, at 75.66 against 75 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Iceland and Malaysia?
- 0.66, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malaysia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Iceland ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.