Cape Verde vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Cape Verde
75
in 2019
Malaysia
75
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
35th
Malaysia rank
35th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Cape Verde
- Malaysia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 75 against 75 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75 | 60.9 | 14.1 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 75 | 73.69 | 1.31 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Cape Verde or Malaysia?
- Cape Verde, at 75 against 75 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Cape Verde and Malaysia?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Malaysia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cape Verde and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Cape Verde ranks 35th and Malaysia ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.