Samoa vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Samoa
30.56
in 2019
San Marino
30.56
in 2019
Samoa rank
151st
San Marino rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Samoa
- San Marino
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 30.56 against 30.56 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Samoa or San Marino?
- Samoa, at 30.56 against 30.56 in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Samoa and San Marino?
- 0, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Samoa ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.