Equatorial Guinea vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Equatorial Guinea
19.44
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
19.44
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
185th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 19.44 against 19.44 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Equatorial Guinea or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 19.44 against 19.44 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Equatorial Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.