Lao People's Democratic Republic vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
19.44
in 2019
South Sudan
19.44
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
185th
South Sudan rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 19.44 against 19.44 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Lao People's Democratic Republic or South Sudan?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 19.44 against 19.44 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and South Sudan?
- 0, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th and South Sudan ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.