Afghanistan vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Afghanistan
27.78
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of
27.78
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
162nd
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
162nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Afghanistan
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 27.78 against 27.78 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 162nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Afghanistan or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Afghanistan, at 27.78 against 27.78 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Afghanistan and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Afghanistan ranks 162nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.