Guinea vs Iran: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Guinea
27.78
in 2019
Iran
27.78
in 2019
Guinea rank
162nd
Iran rank
162nd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

  • Guinea
  • Iran
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 27.78 against 27.78 in Iran, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 162nd and Iran ranks 162nd of 191 countries.

Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Guinea or Iran?
Guinea, at 27.78 against 27.78 in Iran as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Guinea and Iran?
0, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iran?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Iran rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Guinea ranks 162nd and Iran ranks 162nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Iran: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/guinea/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/guinea/iran-islamic-rep/">Guinea vs Iran: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.