How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Australia vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Australia

86.11

in 2019

Lithuania

83.33

in 2019

Australia rank

4th

Lithuania rank

6th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Australia
Lithuania

How they compare

Australia currently reports 86.11 against 83.33 in Lithuania, a difference of 2.78.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 191 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Australia or Lithuania?: Australia, at 86.11 against 83.33 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Australia and Lithuania?: 2.78, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Lithuania?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Australia and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Australia ranks 4th and Lithuania ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/australia/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/australia/lithuania/">Australia vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.