Australia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Australia
86.11
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
83.33
in 2019
Australia rank
4th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
6th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Australia
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 86.11 against 83.33 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 2.78.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 4th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Australia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Australia, at 86.11 against 83.33 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Australia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 2.78, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Australia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Australia ranks 4th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.