Czechia vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Czechia
81.25
in 2014
Latvia
81.25
in 2014
Czechia rank
9th
Latvia rank
9th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Czechia
  • Latvia
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 81.25 against 81.25 in Latvia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 80.36 78.57 1.79 Czechia
2010s 81.25 81.25 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Czechia or Latvia?
Czechia, at 81.25 against 81.25 in Latvia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Czechia and Latvia?
0, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Czechia ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.